With one important exception there were no events of
any historical significance during the Revolutionary
period. Great Britain was fully occupied
in the endeavor to conquer her rebellious subjects,
and the demands upon the resources of the colonies
in the arduous and protracted struggle were too
great to allow any attention to be given to schemes
of Western colonization. The exception
to which reference has been made was the capture of
the British military posts in the west by George
Rogers Clark. Clark was a Virginian
who had made his home in Kentucky. With
a far sighted sagacity, which had in it something of
statesmanship, he conceived and executed the plan
which subsequently furnished the American
commissioners entrusted with the negotiation of the
treaty of 1783, at Paris, with their strongest
argument in support of the claim of the United
States to territory west of the Ohio. It
is probable that Clark did not himself fully
realize its far-reaching consequences. His
immediate purpose was to put a stop to the
persistent Indian attacks on the outer settlements,
which he reasoned could be most effectually done by
destroying the British posts whence the savages
obtained supplies, ammunition, and oftentimes
leadership. One person, however,
appreciated the full significance of Clark's
plan, as will be seen by the following extract from
a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to
Clark before the issue of the campaign was known
in Virginia: "Much solicitude will be felt for the
issue of your expedition to the Wabash; it will at
least delay their expedition to the frontier
settlement, and if successful have an important
bearing ultimately in establishing our north western
boundary."
CAPTURE OF FORTS KASKASKIA, CAHOKIA AND
VINCENNES.
In 1777 Clark sent out scouts to spy out the
country, secure information in regard to the forts,
and ascertain the sentiment of the French
inhabitants of the villages. Having received a
favorable report, he went to Williamsburg, then the
capital of Virginia, where he obtained authority
from Governor Patrick Henry to
enlist a militia force of seven companies of men to
act under his command. The object of the
expedition was kept as secret as possible.
Private instructions were given Clark by the
Governor, in accordance with which he was to attack
the post of Kaskaskia. Supplies were to be
obtained at Fort Pitt. The secrecy Which he
was obliged to maintain made the work of recruiting
his command one of great

RESIDENCE OF MRS. KATE M. MACKEY, YOUNGSTOWN,
OHIO; (top left)
RESIDENCE OF MYRON I. ARMS, YOUNGSTOWN; (top right)
RICHARD BROWN MEMORIAL SUNDAY SCHOOL CHAPEL, YOUNGSTOWN; (bottom
left)
ST. JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH, YOUNGSTOWN (bottom right)
Page 63 -
difficulty, and he
found obstructions thrown in his way by many leading
men on the frontier, "which prevented the enlistment
of as many men as had been contemplated, and led to
frequent desertions." At last, on June 26,
1778, with a small command, not exceeding two
hundred men, he left the Falls of the Ohio, and
descended the river in boats to Fort Massac, forty
miles from its mouth. Thence he marched to
Kaskaskia, which fell into his hands, as did Cahokia
soon after, without the loss of a single life.
Vincennes surrendered "to a mere proclamation when
there was not an American soldier within 100 miles
of the place." For this easy victory Clark
was largely indebted to Father Gibault,
who, representing the sentiment of the French
population, entered into his plans with great warmth
and energy, and afforded him all the assistance in
his power.
Here, although in possession of the country, Clark
was placed in an embarrassing position, owing to the
desire of his men to return home, their term of
enlistment having expired. It was necessary to
hold the conquered territory, or all would be lost.
After much persuation persuasion he
prevailed upon 800 of the men to reenlist for eight
months, and then filled up his companies with
recruits from the villages, at the same time sending
an urgent request to Virginia for reinforcements.
The good effect of his expedition was already seen
in the conduct of the Indian tribes, some ten or
twelve of which within five weeks sent
representatives to sue for peace. Clark
completed his conquests on the Wabash by capturing
the post of Ouiatenon*, and also
showed great ability in outwitting the English and
counteracting their influence with the savages.
----------
* NOTE:
Ouiatenon (Miami-Illinois: waayaahtanonki)
was a dwelling place of members of the Wea tribe
of Native
Americans.
The name Ouiatenon,
also variously given as Ouiatanon, Oujatanon, Ouiatano or
other similar forms, is a French rendering of a term
from the Wea dialect of the Miami-Illinois language
which means "place of the people of the whirlpool",
an ethnonym** for
the Wea. Ouiatenon can be said to refer
generally to any settlement of Wea or to their
tribal lands as a whole, though the name is most
frequently used to refer to a group of extinct
settlements situated together along the Wabash
River in
what is now western Tippecanoe
County, Indiana.
**
An ethnonym is a
name used to refer to an ethnic group, tribe, or
people.
THE BRITISH TRY TO RECOVER
THE FORTS.
"And now," says
Hinsdale, from whom this narrative has been
condensed, "Clark began really to feel the
difficulties of his situation. Destitute of
money, poorly supplied, commanding a small and
widely scattered force, he had to meet and
circumvent an active enemy who was determined to
regain what he had lost. Governor
Hamilton projected a grand campaign against the
French towns that had been captured and the small
force that held them. The feeble issue was the
capture, in December, 1778, of Vincennes, which was
occupied by but two Americans. Clark,
who was in the Illinois at the time of this
disaster, at once put his little force in motion for
the Wabash, knowing, he says, that if he did not
take Hamilton, Hamilton would take
him; and, Feb. 25, 1779, at the end of a march of
two hundred and fifty miles, that ranks in peril and
hardship with Arnold's winter march to
Canada, he again captured the town, the fort, the
governor, and his whole command. Hamilton
was sent to Virginia a prisoner of war, where he was
found guilty of treating American prisoners with
cruelty, and of offering the Indians premiums for
scalps but none for prisoners."
PROJECT AGAINST DETROIT
ABANDONED.
Clark was very anxious to attempt the capture of Detroit, as
being by far the most important of the British posts, but he had
to abandon the enterprise owing to the lack of sufficient
resources. The project was several times considered by
Congress, and also by the Virginia State authorities, but was as
often abandoned for the same reason. Detroit, therefore,
to Clark's great chagrin, remained in the hands of the
British till the end of the war, and, in fact, till 1796.
As it was, Clark won and held the Illinois and the Wabash
in the name of Virginia and of the United States, thus enabling
the American commissioners "to plead uti possidetis
in reference to much of the country beyond the Ohio." "It
would not be easy," says Hinsdale, "to 'find in our
history a case of an officer accomplishing results that were so
great and far-reaching with so small a force."
DISAPPEARANCE OF THE FRENCH POPULATION.
It is
worthy of note that Clark's success was due largely to
the spirit in which he was received and aided by the French
settlers beyond the Ohio. In thus assisting him they were
actuated by their ancient feeling of antipathy
Page 64 -
to the British, and by a desire to see the work of
1763 apparently undone; yet in reality they were
aiding to perfect it. The French alliance of
1778 "made them think they were again opposing the
old enemy." "But * * * the welcome which they
gave the Americans did not arrest their fate or
retard their decline. The breath of
Anglo-American civilization seemed almost as fatal
to them as to the Indians themselves.
Louisiana and the fur lands continued to draw away
their strength and scarcely a trace of them can be
found in Northwestern life today. Cbamplain
laid the foundation of the British province of
Quebec; the State of Louisiana is the child of the
French colony; but the habitants of the Northwest
seem as effectually lost in the past as the Mound
Builders."
THE BRITISH RETAIN NORTHWESTERN POSTS AFTER
THE TREATY OF PARIS.
It
was the Clark conquest, together with the colonial
titles, that enabled the United States to wrest the Northwestern
territory from Great Britain. Possession was reluctantly
yielded, and for some time England, in the hope that the young
republic would prove a failure, refused to surrender the
military posts in the territory that remained in her hands at
the close of the war, alleging as an excuse the non-fulfilment
non-fulfillment on the part of the United States of certain
stipulations of the treaty of peace. For thirteen years
after the conclusion of the treaty British garrisons continued
to occupy Oswego, Niagara, Detroit, Mackinaw, and a number of
minor posts, and a British force even invaded territory that
England did not hold at the close of the war and built Fort
Miami at the rapids of the Maumee. It was at these forts
that the Indians found aid and encouragement in their attacks on
the settlements. This state of things was finally brought
to an end by General Wayne, who pursued the
Indians up to the very guns of Miami, and, in 1795, negotiated
with them the treaty of Greenville. The Jay
treaty by which England bound herself to surrender the forts
which she should have yielded in 1783 had been negotiated the
year before. "On July 11, 1796, a detachment from
Wayne's army raised the Stars and Stripes above the stockade
and village of Detroit, where the French and British colors had
successively waved, and this act completed the tardy transfer of
the old North west to the United States."
The war of 1812, with Hull's surrender of
Detroit, revived for a time British hopes of recovering the
Northwest, and not until the signing of the treaty of Ghent was
the destiny of the territory fully assured.
|