|
|
OHIO GENEALOGY EXPRESS
A Part of Genealogy
Express
|
WELCOME TO
FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
COURT NEWS |
Source: The Daily Ohio Statesman
Dated: Oct. 19, 1838NOTICE,
IS hereby given, that at my instance, a writ of
attachment, was this day issued, by W. T.
Martin, a Justice of the Peace, of Montgomery
township, Franklin county, Ohio, against the goods,
chattles, monies and effects of E. P. & W. R.
Pearmain, absconding debtors, and that further
proceedings will be had thereon, according to law.
Columbus, Aug. 15, 1838. R. G. TRESCOTT.
(Source: Genealogy Bank)(Transcribed by Sharon Wick) |
|
|
Source: Cleveland Gazette (Cleveland, Ohio) Page: 1
Dated: Friday, Sept. 22, 1944
Civil Rights Case Against Cafe Is Won By
Gillespie
Using the HARRY C. SMITH'S
OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS LAW as his guide, Atty, Chester K.
Gillespie, member of the House of Representative from
Cuyahoga County, won a civil rights case he had filed
against the Marzetti restaurant in Columbus,
Ohio, last week. After more than a year of
sustained wrankling, in and out of court, during which
time at least three different judges heard portions of
the case in the Franklin county common pleas court, Atty,
Gillespie and his attorney finally settled the suit out
of court.
Rep. Gillespie and his attorney Joseph E. Bowman,
refused to divulge details of the settlement or the
amount involved but it is understood, from reliable
sources that the sum was substantial.
The suit was filed in February, 1943, charging that the
complainant's civil rights had been violated when
Marzetti's management refused to serve Gillespie and
further charged that the denial was brought about upon a
basis of color discrimination.
Failing in the delaying tactics, the Marzetti
company finally attacked the constitutionality of the
Ohio civil rights law, contending that the statute was
in violation of the 14th amendment of the federal
constitution in that it invaded one's rights of freedom
of contract.
The court sustained Atty. Bowman when he pointed out
that the Ohio civil rights law was not designed to
protect property rights, but to protect personal or
human rights. The Cuyahoga county representative,
who is now a candidate for the Ohio senate, said that he
was satisfied with the settlement made by the restaurant
management and that his sole purpose in filing the suit
was TO GUARANTEE THAT THE OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS LAW DOES NOT
BECOME A MOCKERY. |
|
|
Source: The Daily Ohio
Statesman
Dated: Dec. 17, 1845NOTICE: - All persons interested
will take notice that Moses Beers, on the 17th
day of November, A. D. 1845, sued out a writ of
attachment from the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin
county, in the state of Ohio, against Elijah Beers,
for the sum of two hundred dollars damages, which writ
has been served and returned.
Attest:
L. STARLING Jr., Clerk
L. H. Webster, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Columbus, Dec. 16, 1845
(Source: Genealogy Bank)(Transcribed by Sharon Wick) |
|
|
|
Source: Daily Ohio Statesman -
Dated
June 27, 1849
THE unknown heirs and devisees of
Archibald Cambridge are hereby notified that on
the ninth day of April, A. D., 1849, a bill in chancery
was filed against them and their heirs, in the court of
common please of Franklin county, Ohio, the object and
prayer of which bill is, that on the first hearing, the
court will make partition of the following real estate,
lying and said Franklin county to wit: One hundred
acres ofland, off the west side of the southwest quarter
of section number twenth-eight, township twelve, range
twenty-one, refugee land so called, which said quarter
section was patented to the heirs of Edward Entill,
and being all that portion of said quarter section that
was owned by John Cambridge at the time of his
death; or if it shall appear that said partition cannot
be made without manifest injury, then that said premises
may be sold, or other proper action be taken, pursuant
to the statute in such case, made and provided, and in
case of such sale or other disposition of said premises
under the order of the court, that such order may be
made in reference to the share or proceeds of the share
of the said Archibald Cambridge, as the court may
deem just and proper, &c. And said unknown heirs
and devisees are further notified that unless they shall
appear and plead, answer or demur to said bill within
sixty-days after the next term of this court, said
complainants will, at the term of said court next after
the expiration of said sixty days, apply to said court
to take said bill as confessed, and to decree thereon
accordingly.
SWAN & ANDREWS.
June 27, 1849. - 6w.w. Solic'rs for Compl'nt.
(Transcribed by Sharon Wick) |
|
|
Source: Patriot (Harrisburg, PA) Vol.: XI
Page: 1
Dated: Saturday, June 22, 1878
GREAT HANGING DAY.
Executions in Maryland, Ohio, Illinois and Arkansas
CINCINNATI, June 21. - Perry Bowster, who
murdered an aged tollgate keeper and his wife on the
Circleville pike, a short distance from Chillicothe,
Ohio, last October, was hung at Chillicothe at 11
o'clock this morning in the presence of a very large
crowd. Bowster went quietly to the
scaffold. He refused to perit any religious
ceremonies, had nothing to say and maintained a defiant
attitude to the last. His neck was broken at the
fall of the trap. He never confessed his crime. |
CLICK HERE to RETURN to
FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO |
CLICK HERE to
RETURN to
OHIO GENEALOGY EXPRESS |
FREE GENEALOGY RESEARCH
is My MISSION
GENEALOGY EXPRESS
This Webpage has been created by Sharon Wick exclusively for Ohio
Genealogy Express ©2008
Submitters retain all copyrights |
|
|